NEW Deadline for applications: Tuesday 30 April 2019
The scheme provides seed-funding to projects that will introduce new ideas, explore innovative teaching and learning practices, and will have a positive impact on student learning outcomes.
We will offer funding up to £3,000 for projects which integrate technology to enhance students’ learning experience.
Learning Technology and Innovation (LTI) encourage the submission of proposals falling under any of the following themes, or on any other general theme of teaching and learning innovation.
Examples: students producing short films for an end-of-course presentation; writing and peer evaluation of blog posts on core concepts; creating research posters and/or infographics.
Examples: using gamification elements such as badges or leaderboards; creating simulations to link theory to practice; using an existing game or creating your own in your course.
Examples: create online learning activities to be used in seminars or for extra practice for students; use video-conferencing in or outside of the classroom.
Examples: introduce e-portfolios, peer review, or e-marking and feedback tools in formative or summative assessment.
Examples: experimenting with different teaching styles and room setups; introducing project-based seminars; deconstructing the teaching hierarchy, i.e. students become teachers.; using technology to open up the space.
Examples: harness the computing power in your students’ bags:introduce BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) into the classroom for data crowdsourcing, collective research, instant voting; introduce agile teaching by using polling; enhance and support digital literacy by integrating social media
Examples: Pushing the boundaries of teaching and learning by experimenting with new trends and teaching experiences. Using online tools to introduce group work across institutions and countries. Replacing traditional lecture and seminars with more flexible and student focused sessions.
SPARK! is a scheme open to LSE teaching staff on the LSE payroll (e.g. academics, GTAs).
Applicants need to be supported by their Head of Department (or Deputy Head of department for Teaching and Learning).
Applicants need to be available throughout the project (including evaluation). Should there be a change in their availability (e.g. sabbatical, maternity leave, etc.), applicants will need to inform LTI as soon as possible to make the necessary adjustments.
⦿ Cost of software licence, technology, etc. for the period of the grant
⦿ Hourly-paid staff time
- i.e. Research Assistant, extra GTA time (particularly covering evaluation costs)
⦿ Conference registration fees (excluding travel)
⦿ Equipment. LTI are offering kits of equipment that can be borrowed for up to a year:
- Filming equipment
- iPad kits: iPad Air or iPad Mini
- Podcasting kits: Zoom H1 digital audio recorder and accessories
⦿ In 2019 you can also apply for LTI iPad kits and you will be able to keep them after the completion of the project. For further information, please email LTI
Funding cannot cover:
⦿ Ongoing software license, technology, etc. beyond the period of the grant. Applicants should arrange ongoing costs with their department
⦿ Funding cannot be used to release academics from their teaching responsibilities (i.e. buying out of your own teaching time), but can be used to hire GTAs or Research Assistants specifically for the project.
⦿ Conference travel fees (these should be arranged by the applicant)
Applications will be assessed against the following criteria:
⦿ The extent that the project should improve/enhance the student experience.
⦿ The extent to which the project is innovative within the Department/School. We will not fund replications of existing practice within the same department.
⦿ Clear rationale, aims & objectives.
⦿ Appropriate method to achieve the aims.
⦿ Clear set of outcomes and plan to evaluate and disseminate them.
⦿ Sustainability. If there are expectations of ongoing costs or support requirements beyond the initial grant period, applicants should outline how the course/department will meet these.
⦿ Transferability. If there are plans to adopt the proposed approach or intervention for other courses within your department or discipline.
⦿ The degree of scalability across disciplines or the School.
Before you apply:
- Contact LTI to arrange a meeting to discuss your idea.
- Inform your Head of Department (or Deputy Head of department for Teaching and Learning) of your application. You will need their approval.
- Make sure your proposal meets all the required School Quality Assurance processes (e.g. USSC/GSSC approval, and/or discussion with the Academic Partnerships and/or other departments, where/if necessary). For more information on Quality Assurance at LSE visit http://www.lse.ac.uk/intranet/LSEServices/TQARO/Home.aspx.
- Make sure your proposal considers any ethical issues. For more information visit LSE’s Ethics Code on http://www.lse.ac.uk/intranet/LSEServices/ethics/home.aspx.
How to apply:
Fill in the online SPARK! application form.
N.B.: Incomplete applications will not be considered. Make sure you fill in the required information for each section, including budget breakdown, timescale and evaluation plan.
By submitting your application, you agree to the SPARK! grant expectations:
- To work in collaboration with the allocated LTI staff member for the whole duration of the project: design, implementation, evaluation and dissemination.
- To complete the project within the suggested timescales.
- To make every effort to attend a minimum of one dissemination event organised by LTI.
- To produce the SPARK! evaluation report.
- To contribute to LTI’s efforts of dissemination with LSE’s teaching community (e.g. blog post, interview, etc.).
- Your project meets the required School Quality Assurance processes.
- Your project is in accordance with LSE’s Ethics Code.
LTI will review the applications before sending them to the SPARK! & IGNITE! committee. You may be contacted to provide further information or clarification on your application.
Applications will be reviewed by the committee comprised of key teaching and learning staff from across the School. However, incomplete applications or applications that do not meet the terms of agreement will not be considered.
Head of Teaching and Learning Centre (Chair)
Director of Academic and Professional Development
Senior Academics and/or previous LTI Grant holders
LSE Student Union Education Sabbatical Officer
LTI Senior Learning Technologists
|Deadline for applications||Tuesday 30 April 2019 (Summer Term Week 1)
|LTI Review||Summer Term Week 2|
|Committee Review||Summer Term Week 3|
|Approval||Summer Term Week 4|
|Notification||Within two weeks of the Committee Review meeting
- You will receive a letter of approval from LTI signed by the Pro-Director, Education.
- Your allocated LTI staff member will contact you to arrange an initial meeting to discuss and agree:
- the practicalities of the project (design, timescales, resources, evaluation and dissemination plan)
- the roles and responsibilities of involved stakeholders.
- After the meeting you will receive a summary of everything and discussed and agreed, including a reminder of the terms of agreement.
- The project will officially kick off following your consent to everything discussed and agreed with your allocated Learning Technologist. Following that, LTI will arrange transfer of the funds and/or start the equipment loan process as agreed.
If you are not successful
You will receive a letter explaining to you the reasons why your application was not successful and further recommendations.
Augmented Reality equipment is used throughout a new course “Behavioural Science in an Age of New Technology” to demonstrate how it can create behavioural change. Students will then be given the opportunity to create dissertation research that would combine this technology with real-world behavioural interventions. “The world is becoming increasingly digital, and many of the students whom I supervise for their dissertation projects want undertake research that would investigate how technology can be used to create behavioural interventions that would nudge people to eat healthier, exercise more, make better decisions, etc”. Dario Krpan, Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science. Read more…
H5P activities such as audio recordings, dialog cards, and self-test questions, will be used to deliver content and facilitate ongoing self-assessment, which will allow students to improve their skills. LTI will be helping with developing H5P interactive activities on Moodle and with the evaluation of the use of H5P and it’s impact on student learning. Read more…
Students will conduct research using crowdsourcing platforms such as Amazon Mechanical Turk, Crowdflower or Prolific to carry out replication studies in psychology in different populations. Students will be able to work together to discuss common issues and share their individual data collections for cross-cultural comparisons. Read more…
SPARK! Winners 2016/2017
This project aims to replace group presentations with short films narrating the students’ take on the theme of multiculturalism in a fourth year European Institute course. “I want students to approach the role of presentation in EU 458 from a fresh perspective that facilitates greater creativity and ownership of ideas. ” Jennifer Jackson-Preece, European Institute. Read more…
“The aim of the project is to create a platform, using Numbas maths e-assessment software, for the MA100 Mathematical Methods course. This platform will be accessible by any student on the MA100 course via a PC with a reasonable internet connection. It will be designed to present a question to the student, guide them and provide hints where necessary, and assess their work. The questions will serve as the homework that they currently get. “ Michael Yasemides. Read more…
“The podcast would involve mixed student groups interviewing key LSE staff members (and eventually external interviewees) about their research, with the aim of (a) breaking down barriers between students and academics, (b) encouraging the students to engage with ‘leading edge’ research produced in the school, (c) helping develop a culture where students can critically evaluate the research considered by academics in the department.” Neil Lee, Department of Geography. Read more…
“This project aims to produce and disseminate original, student-led research through an innovative online platform which will include audio-visual media (e.g. recorded interviews, data visualisation, and short documentaries) alongside more conventionally-grounded academic output (e.g. text-based reports). The project also aims to improve students’ learning through the development of transferable skills in coding, photo and video editing, data visualisation, and associated skillsets”. Christina Russell, Department of Media and Communications. Read more…
“This project aims at teaching students to bring their research to life by offering training in data visualisation techniques. Educational modules using Tableau software will help students enhance their ability to tell stories with data and better communicate their research. Data visualisation is an integral feature of the information age, and research has shown the positive effect of visualisation on pedagogy”. Kiran Phull, Department of International Relations. Read more…
This project aims to introduce a new form of assessment with student-produced videos. “Students learn to analyse a document looking at who made the source, in what context, with what audience in mind, and what scholarly arguments surround it…” Taylor Sherman, Department of International History. Read more…
SPARK! Winners 2015/2016
The Game of Research is designed for social science students undertaking a final-year qualitative primary research dissertation. Through the game students learn the six essential components for a successful qualitative research project: research question, design/proposal, ethical approval, methods/fieldwork, analysis, writing and referencing. See more…
In this project, Tobias will develop, document, and teach a Workshop for Sustainable Authorship for students of the LSE that familiarizes and equips them with the writing environment of Academic Markdown. Read more…
This project will “explore the usefulness of establishing and curating an open access digital ‘living’ archive to support problem-based learning about contemporary topics in global business management particularly (but not only) reconfiguring business models and service innovation”. Susan Scott, Department of Management. Read more…
This project aims to design and implement three PowerPoint-based interactive simulations for use in introductory undergraduate classes. According to Gustav and Andreas “currently available solutions are targeted at course-long activities, at a high cost of time and preparation effort for both teachers and students. Instead, this project explicitly aims at providing a low-cost, easily accessible and class-long interactive experience to students to encourage theoretical linkage with own in-class experience” See more…
The project will develop the use of student blogs as one component of the summative assessment for AN300 Advanced Theory of Social Anthropology. Students will create and maintain their own blog using the WordPress platform. “It is hoped that students will be able to articulate and develop original ideas prompted by their reading of these books, and relate them to other literature they have read over the course of their degree.” Harry Walker, Department of Anthropology. Read more…
Olga produced a series of podcasts based on the key vocabulary (words, expressions and sentences) from each unit and created corresponding scripts. She made the package available to download via the Moodle course. Many students said that “they helped increase their confidence as language users and proved very helpful when preparing for the exam mentioned that the podcasts”. Olga Sobolev, Language Centre. See more…
“As a blogging platform, Mahara has functionality whereby it is possible for anyone to comment on a particular blog. The first part of the feedback process therefore involved students reading at least one blog post by another student and providing feedback (in the form of a comment) to the author. The function was also used for the markers to provide feedback on the blog posts”. Edgar Whitley, Department of Management. See more…